Filed to "mustang week" updated with front view. 

"Sir_Stig: and toxic masculinity ruins the party again." (sir-stig) 04/16/2016 at 16:50 • Filed to: Mustangs

1

17

Just... Why? Is it to give pedestrians a fighting chance? ;)

Dr. Zoidberg - RIP Oppo > Sir_Stig: and toxic masculinity ruins the party again. 04/16/2016 at 14:30

1

Those clouds are really pretty

whoarder is tellurium > Sir_Stig: and toxic masculinity ruins the party again. 04/16/2016 at 14:37

1

I like the stonework and design of the buildings in this photo.

TheHondaBro > Sir_Stig: and toxic masculinity ruins the party again. 04/16/2016 at 14:40

0

That’s a nice stop sign.

Urambo Tauro > Sir_Stig: and toxic masculinity ruins the party again. 04/16/2016 at 14:45

2

I’ve never seen that “let’s pretend it’s a real bumper” before. At first glance, I didn’t like it. But now I think I see what they’re going for. The “bumper”, the lamp trim, the lettering... all that chrome is definitely an attempt at an old-school look. They didn’t go off the deep end by adding chrome vents or chrome door trim.

I’ll have to admit: I don’t hate it. This car is supposed to be retro anyway, so bonus points for not doing it to a SN95. I wonder what the front looks like.

Blondude > Sir_Stig: and toxic masculinity ruins the party again. 04/16/2016 at 15:22

4

It works a lot better on Challengers. In fact I’d say it looks better than stock.

Sir_Stig: and toxic masculinity ruins the party again. > Urambo Tauro 04/16/2016 at 16:52

0

The fitment left much to be desired.

Sir_Stig: and toxic masculinity ruins the party again. > Blondude 04/16/2016 at 16:53

0

Eh, I never love chrome

StoneCold > Sir_Stig: and toxic masculinity ruins the party again. 04/16/2016 at 17:00

0

I like it. A lot.

No, I will not give back my Mustang Club card. I am not ashamed.

Arch Duke Maxyenko, Shit Talk Extraordinaire > Blondude 04/16/2016 at 17:02

5

no

Urambo Tauro > Sir_Stig: and toxic masculinity ruins the party again. 04/16/2016 at 17:22

0

Are you commenting on the rear fitment, or describing the front fitment?

Bourbon&JellyBeans > Sir_Stig: and toxic masculinity ruins the party again. 04/16/2016 at 17:24

1

JUST BUY A FUCKING FIRST GEN.

scoob > Arch Duke Maxyenko, Shit Talk Extraordinaire 04/16/2016 at 18:22

4

Bman76 (no it doesn't need a WS6 hood) is dead, long live Bman76 M. Arch > Sir_Stig: and toxic masculinity ruins the party again. 04/16/2016 at 18:25

2

Took me a second, to get it. They’re trying to recreate something like this.

I despise chrome on post 1980 cars but, if they lowered it an inch it might look a lot better.

Sir_Stig: and toxic masculinity ruins the party again. > Urambo Tauro 04/17/2016 at 10:17

0

Rear was especially bad

Sir_Stig: and toxic masculinity ruins the party again. > StoneCold 04/17/2016 at 10:19

0

You should be though

Urambo Tauro > Sir_Stig: and toxic masculinity ruins the party again. 04/17/2016 at 10:32

1

I think I see what you mean; there’s a shadow under the lower corner of the rear “bumper” like it’s peeling away from the body.

I don’t know what’s worse: poor fitment of raised chrome, or the lack of depth in the streamlined use of chrome on modern cars.

Urambo Tauro > Blondude 04/17/2016 at 10:35

1

I like it! Some chrome mirror housings might help with the effect.